Well actually lots of people repaired to the pub after a meeting with Rotem Mor, an Israeli refusenik at the Quaker Friends Meeting House in Bangor last night. 18 months into his IDF service Rotem became a conscientious objector, rejecting his uniform and at one point being sent to jail for a month. That was almost ten years ago, since then he has been a traveller, a peace activist, a student of Middle Eastern music (at one point in the meeting he took time out to sing to us) see this in depth ei interview with him and a 2001 Haaretz piece about the growing numbers of conscientious objectors. This particular last minute leg of Rotem’s tour was due to Bangor Peace & Justice members Steve and Rania who are married, he British she Palestinian, both friends of Rotem, thus a pleasing breadth of experience and diversity of perspectives could be learned about. And also merely by accident of the turnout necessitating a move into the larger main meeting room where the chairs are in a circle, the meeting seemed more open, less hierarchical than ‘a lecture’ and perhaps that helped it progress past an airing of opinions to a discussion which given the subject is not always easy.

We didn’t get into a lot of hard point ideological specifics, I have seen a report of another meeting in England which was pretty fractious with people leaving if answers did not meet their requirements, which is a lost opportunity. The issue of normalisation and space for resistance was discussed and was a case in point of both acknowledging and respecting valid theory while also trying to make things work in reality. Anti semitism was also mentioned with Rotem noting while racism against semitic peoples has in the past in Europe been directed against Jewish people, now Islamic people were the target. There was hope, the idea of the IDF warrior on occupied land having to defend against another Holocaust was propaganda that was losing its hold on younger generations. However the increasingly authoritarian nature of the Israeli government was a threat, for activists they see the legal framework being put into place that in the future can be used to close down dissent entirely.

Breaking the Silence was brought up, the movement by ex IDF soldiers to speak about the abuses they had been involved in against Palestinians, while Rotem initially got a frosty reception from his family his relationship with them is now better than ever, other soldiers with PTSD and intolerant nationalistic Zionist families have been less lucky. Important work was therefore done in talking to pre-service Israeli teens to make them aware that there was a choice (albeit a hard one) to refuse service. Rotem had done this with feminist organisation New Profile who campaign to reduce the militaristic mature of Israeli society, as evidence of the worsening authoritarianism they have been targets of police raids and harassment. Rania and Rotem talked about the othering and alienation of Palestinians that soldiers are conditioned towards, for example to enable them to look through a sniper scope and see not people but a target, and a similar process in the past engaged in by recruiters of suicide bombers. To both planned killing represented a barrier towards solutions, while at the same time the faux ‘dialogue’ encouraged by outside groups failed to understand some basic realities of the situation, an occupied people are not on an equal footing with an occupying people.

I asked about the One State Solution, Rotem saw that and others as possible, to many state or a no state solution (anarchists rejoice!) what he saw as more relevant was changing the current ways in which people thought and related to one another. Then a slow migration to the pub occurred where banana bread beer bemused the Israeli palate, while I sipped some weak pepsi, some discussion of all the covert pig eating and drinking that goes on in the ‘Holy Land’ was amusing to this non boozing vegetarian atheist. I talked some more with Rania who was now having to contend with the UK immigration system, it costs loads of money you have to do stupid exams about Britain and swear allegiance to the Queen (so strictly speaking there is no way I qualify to be a British citizen, my answer to the exam and pledge- the Queen, another in along line of ruling class inbreds who have waged war upon the people for centuries, even when my ancestors were in another country -Ireland- the frickin’ English aristocrats molested us. So fuck ‘em all, I know revolutions just aren’t British but can we at least do something about the rich robbing us blind every bleedin’ day). The institutionalised racism of Israel and the British anti immigrant version are a lot to bear, Rania and I talked about the background anxiety/fear felt by immigrants and also those on welfare under threat of cuts and punitive bureaucracy, many millions of people prey to bureaucratic whims, errors and frauds and ideological warfare against them and we should be united in opposition. One aspect of  the immigration system is that it discourages and in fact penalises political and human right activism, so rather than welcome engaged citizens concerned about the world and the injustices in it our system disapproves of it. Again, the worst measures of the state are applied to those least permitted or able to contest them, racism, imbalance of power, different in application and degree but not strangers in any country.

So a Jew, a Palestinian and an Englishman walk into a Welsh bar and talk and joke, and divide and rule fails just a little more, propaganda fails a little more and the future has possibilities not all dictated by the powerful.

Share
  • US report: The murder rate of transgender persons is 17 times the national average
  • Pink News: Every three days a transgendered person is killed somewhere in the world…the number of reports of murdered trans people is increasing.

Brazil is by far the most dangerous place in the world for the transgendered community. In 2008, 59 people were murdered while another 23 murders were reported so far this year. Last year, 16 transgendered people were murdered in the United States, the second most dangerous place on Earth.

Events and locations 2010

Share

Wednesday night’s screening of Outside the Law: Stories from Guantánamo with journalist & co-director Andy Worthington went off very well. Turnout was not massive but around 30 people made it to the Blue Sky Cafe to see the film and Q&A afterwards, many were new faces so it seems word had spread beyond usual networks which is good. Earwicga saved the evening when the projector rejected Andy’s DVD, but her copy which she had bought some time previously worked fine (you can buy the film here). The Blue Sky Cafe location enabled people to come early, have a meal then see the film. Bangor Peace & Justice Group (who with Occasional Cinema) pulled this showing off in what turned out to be a topical week with the payments to detainees and subsequent announcement by ‘justice’ secretary Kenneth Clarke of a green paper to attempt to forever cloak the security services in unaccountable secrecy, literally cloak and dagger. These became a topic of conversation and Andy filled in a lot more detail from his expert perspective, he had talked to Moazzam Begg about the payments and there appears to be no conditions (ie to silence or abandoning other legal actions) to affect future cases. He also told us that when the detainees met with Kenneth Clarke in summer they expressed how unimportant the money was compared to getting Shaker Aamer released, Clarke apparently was taken aback by this as well as appearing to be relatively unaware of Shaker’s case or importance to the other detainees (imagine, a Tory not understanding that money does not trump solidarity). Andy also talked about subsequent revelations that the previous New Labour administration had done virtually nothing for Shaker Aamer, no visit in five years and the person detailed to the case had done little or nothing. He talks about some of this today relating to his talk with Aamer’s lawyer the legedary Gareth Peirce, a big campaign push by Amnesty International starts on Monday to push for Shaker Aamer’s release, see here and here. As William Hague says he has talked to Hillary Clinton about this and claims to be asking for his release now is the time to put pressure on the government.

Andy Worthington is a very friendly (not to say suave) campaigning journalist who together with Polly Nash has made a very compelling film. Interestingly the BBC rejected showing it while opining it would do well at film festivals, have they a policy against quality independent documentaries? The thing is, as Andy recounted, they did have a doco on Guantánamo, fronted by Michael Portillo, who ended the film with a defence of torture, so it’s not like they are against advocacy journalism (if one were to class the film as such which I would resist, I think it simply balances the lies of the powerful with what actually happened)… it’s just what they are advocating, apparently human rights are more controversial than being pro-torture, who knew? Mirroring elite opinion may be a successful strategy for the corporate Machiavellian multi-millionaire on the make *cough* Mark Thompson* cough*, but it isn’t actually journalism.

Outside the Law: Stories from Guantánamo is one of those instances where you think you know most of the stuff, but they lay it out in a clean direct way that brings the immediacy of the issues right back into sharp focus together with new information. It also presents a stark narrative of the Bush administration with Blair government aiding, carefully proceeding to create legal cover for torture as they began their prosecution of the War on Terror. There are no mistakes, bad apples or random & isolated atrocities here, it was systematic (and I would also say a good deal of racism was involved and imperial privilege) and careful policy to fight this ludicrous long generational replacement for the cold war in a medieval fashion. The only worst of the worst were ‘our’ sides adoption of torture as weapon of war. I do not think we know all that has been done yet, Bagram still operates in a total legal vacuum today, and that’s just what we know of. New details come up in the film, like the short lived prisoners council at Guantánamo lead by Shaker Aamer, it lasted for about a fortnight before the military shut it down. Binyam Mohamed’s holding up of a sign ‘Con-mission’ at his military commission hearing after querying what really we should call the non legal kangaroo court.

The film creates a journalistic framework of clearly conveyed information building into a horrifying and anger inducing record of our slump into barbarity but then it quietly presents the most powerful elements, the survivors, the ex detainees, Polly Nash the codirector also edited and she did a great job in unobtrusively but powerfully structuring the film. Moazzam Begg and Omar Deghayes are interviewed and they recount not just their torture and ill treatment but what was done to others, again Shaker Aamer figures prominently, because he was naturally a charismatic, well spoken prisoner and natural leader he was subject to the most severe torture. Andy said that when they came to interview Omar Deghayes he ended up speaking in great detail for around five hours, this being common in some torture survivors, at some point they come out with everything in one go, it’s a significant step and for the film a great strength. Omar is soft spoken, personable and this brings home how essential to the torturers work it has been for the media to dehumanise, vilify and demonise the detainees, to absolutely remove human empathy from any perception of the detainees. This was illustrated by the turnover of guards, they would be rotated out of Gitmo every few months, standard procedure served a function because in that time many guards went from hate filled 911 fetishising bullies into realising they were part of a concentration camp against the very principles they swore to uphold. Empathy must be exterminated at all costs for divide and rule to function. Moazzam Begg is another case in point, even now Decents rallying behind the hysterical (yes I said it) Gita Sahgal continue to harangue survivors of torture eagerly promoted by pro-torture power blocs in media and government. As the events of this week demonstrate, this is not history, this is an ongoing effort by our ruling elites and security complexes to make torture an accepted standard operating procedure, albeit at arms length from mediated narratives of our ‘noble wars’ and the all encompassing excuse of our national security imperatives. As Moazzam and Omar say, they thought once in UK/US hands their ordeal would end, it was then in fact the torture got far worse. Yes folks, that’s us, now just remind me about patriotism?

After the film the Q&A was very useful, Andy’s close coverage of Guantánamo meant he could recall dates and events to draw meaning and direction from the years of official obfuscation and denial, one questioner expressed how powerless they feel to do anything although quite what Barack Obama was doing there no one knows and I’m not sure anyone believed his lack of power. Oh no wait that was actually a regular member of the audience, Obama is President of the United States and has in his power the means to close Guantánamo and instruct the justice department to pursue torturers such as George Bush and Dick Cheney who have openly admitted war crimes in global corporate media, Hmmm. Another conclusion was simply governments do not pursue a previous administration’s crimes, they cover them up. However by the end of the evening a conclusion of- where to now, might go something like this:-

  • Campaign and achieve the release of Shaker Aamer
  • Build a wide opposition to the ConDems green paper effectively proposing putting security services beyond the law
  • Continue pressure to close Guantánamo
  • While it is unlikely actual justice will be achieved and all officials and operatives involved in torture will be tried in court there will be weak links, these should be exploited and war criminals brought to trial. My suggestion -Jack Straw.

Andy Worthington and others involved with the film are doing more showings which you can find on his website here.

Do visit the Blue Sky Cafe if you are needing sustenance while wandering the streets of Bangor, dedicated people trying to make it a real hub of community activity and a successful business (also if they make more money they could invest in a swankier sound system which I think would enrich the film showings).

Bangor Peace & Justice (here or FB here) meet every Monday at the Friends Meeting House (map) and on this Sunday 6pm also at the meeting house Rotem Mor an Israeli refusenik & activist will be speaking. And see the Facebook page for the Save Shaker Aamer Campaign.

Share

Click for full size PDF version

Bangor Peace  & Justice’s showing of Outside the Law: Stories from Guantanamo on this Wednesday evening (food at 6, film at 7.30, talk after) 17th November at the Blue Sky Cafe Bangor (w/ Occasional Cinema), with a talk and Q&A by co-director Andy Worthington. Don’t miss an essential human rights event for North Wales!

Share

Click for full size PDF version

This is a poster wot I done made for Bangor Peace  & Justice’s showing of Outside the Law: Stories from Guantanamo which is on Wednesday evening (food at 6, film at 7.30, talk after) 17th November at the Blue Sky Cafe Bangor (w/ Occasional Cinema), with a talk and Q&A by co-director Andy Worthington. Don’t miss an essential human rights event for North Wales!

Share


Research from the Institute of Race Relations
, including a review of 38 asylum- and immigration-related deaths in Europe over 18 months, shows the human cost of EU moves to slash budgets for refugee integration and accelerate the pace of removals – thereby undermining international conventions.

In its report, Accelerated removals: a study of the human cost of EU deportation policies, 2009-2010, the IRR has documented the deaths of 28 men, 8 women and 2 boys, mostly asylum seekers, from January 2009 to 30 June 2010, in ten EU countries, Norway and Switzerland.

The vast majority of the deaths were either suicides linked to fear of deportation, or deaths that could have been avoided if asylum seekers were afforded proper medical care. Cuts to legal aid budgets and reduced access to justice, the targeting of specific nationals for charter-flight removals, overcrowding and appalling conditions in detention centres where hunger strikes are rife, are also placing individuals under abnormal levels of stress that are deleterious to health and undermine the will to live.

Unaccompanied children
The deaths of two unaccompanied children in Sweden, one of whom, an Iraqi boy, committed suicide after hearing that his asylum claim had been rejected. There have been countless other incidents of self-harm amongst children and teenagers, including that of Lorraine Thulambo, who tried to hang himself in Yarl’s Wood and that of a 16-year-Afghan boy who suffered critical burns to his torso and head when he set himself on fire at a reception centre in Norway.

Hunger strikes
Three young men died, in Austria, Switzerland and Germany, in circumstances related to hunger-strikes. One Nigerian man who had been on hunger strike, 29-year-old Joseph Ndukaku Chiakwu, died of a heart attack after he was subjected to a so-called level 4 procedure of expulsion, bound hand and foot and placed in shackles at Zurich’s Kloten airport. In Austria, where another hunger-striking asylum seeker, 20-year-old Gagenpreet Singh, died of a heart attack, there has been a 31 per cent increase in the number of people held in preventive detention awaiting deportation who have been on hunger strike.

Iraq and Afghanistan
Six of those who died were from Iraq and three from Afghanistan. EU governments are implicated in the US-led military engagement in these countries yet they are chartering flights to effect removals. Several people fearing deportation to Iraq or Afghanistan committed suicide including Osman Rasul, a 27-year-old destitute Iraqi Kurd who died after jumping from a seventh floor of a tower block in Nottingham. Osman Rasul had been represented by the charity Refugee and Migrant Justice (RMJ) and had been cast out of the legal system following the government-induced closure of RMJ.

Africans
Many of the cases involve African asylum seekers and the IRR is concerned that a higher level of force is used to remove asylum seekers to African countries. Six of the thirteen people who are known to have died in European deportation attempts since 1991 were Nigerian.

Share

So our treatment of torture survivors for the few who manage to challenge it in court is shown to be a further abuse and the govt. pays damages. I expect this is because they have calculated it is cheaper to abuse everyone and pay the few that manage to get into court than actually treat people well on first principle. Not just in financial terms, they play to the tabloid provocations of xenophobia, the end result is simply- a person escaping torturer, when they get to the UK, they face another brutal regime intent on abusing them. Now just remind me exactly what the fuck I am meant to be patriotic for? Oh right, to make me feel that this kind of abuse is unimportant and we are naturally better then others so this either should be ignored or applauded. (also see Earwicga)

Millions of pounds in compensation is being paid to migrants who have been traumatised after being locked up in detention centres across the UK, the Guardian has learned.

Government figures show £12m in “special payments” – including compensation – for 2009/10 and a further £3m the year before.

The Home Office said it did not record the proportion of special payments made in compensation, but officials accepted that the figure over the past three years ran to millions of pounds.

Lawyers who are acting for detainees said there was an “epidemic of mistreatment” in the asylum system.

Harriet Wistrich, of Birnberg Peirce, said there was a “systemic failure” to protect torture victims who came to the UK seeking refuge. “It is nothing short of scandalous that we are causing serious harm by detaining people, sometimes for long periods of time, who have done nothing other than seek a place of sanctuary from the horrors they have escaped from, in the mistaken belief that Britain is a just and tolerant society.”

In one case this summer a Ugandan who had been tortured was awarded £110,000 after the court ruled he had been unlawfully detained in the UK for 10 months. The man, known just as Francis to protect his family in Uganda, fled to the UK in 2006. He said he had been beaten with sticks, burnt and hung upside down after being imprisoned in Uganda. He said he was also raped several times by guards.

“They did it many, many, times and when they were torturing me it felt like they wanted to kill me,” he said. “The guards also set fire to a plastic jerrycan and let the burning plastic drip on to my head and shoulders. It is always with me, something that I always think about that I was tortured by rape … it is something that I really can’t stop thinking about.”

On arrival in the UK, Francis said, his medical report was lost by officials and then he was refused access to a doctor. “My experience of detention [in the UK] was terrible. The officials were rude and it felt as though they had been trained to refuse all asylum seekers. I told them again and again that I had been tortured, that I have given a report showing evidence of my wounds and answered all their questions but they did not seem interested. I thought this was a country that would protect me and would respect human rights and human dignity, but I have seen something different.”

Wistrich, who was Francis’s lawyer, said his treatment in the UK had exacerbated the post-traumatic stress he suffered after his torture in Uganda. “If Francis’s case was the exception that proved the rule this would be bad enough but, unfortunately, I have seen many similar cases and from my anecdotal experience there is clearly a systemic failure to safeguard against the unlawful detention of torture victims.”

Share