The Bush crime family (Mike Malloy’s phrase) proves itself as such with this deal to silence David Hicks:-

AUSTRALIAN terror detainee David Hicks agreed today to withdraw charges that he was abused while held by the United States as part of a plea deal that limits his prison term to seven years.

US Military judge Colonel Ralph Kohlmann asked Hicks if he agreed that he had “never been illegally treated by any persons in the control or custody of the United States” during his detention in Afghanistan and subsequent transfer to the Guantanamo Bay prison camp in Cuba.

Hicks replied, “Yes.” -

Don Corleone would be proud.

Share

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GCpNWWLjMHo]

Jon Benjamin -comedy God.

Share

H/t to the posting machine that is Lenin’s Tomb,

-Dr. Les Roberts from Columbia University discusses the famous Johns Hopkins/Lancet studies of “excess civilian deaths” in Iraq since 2003, the UK government scientists who told Tony Blair that Lancet had, if anything, underestimated the dead at 655,000 (more than the Rwandan genocide of 1994), the deliberate efforts of the U.S. government to suppress numbers of the dead.-

[audio http://dissentradio.com/charles/0328awlesroberts.mp3]

The interview is only a quarter of an hour so you owe it to yourself and the dead to listen. It has added resonance now we know the Govt. acknowledged the methodology as sound but still disputed the study.

Anthony attends catholic masses with Cherie and so may well understand the the concepts of sin and what constitutes a mortal sin “Immediately after death the souls of those who die in a state of mortal sin descend into hell.”. Which just this week Pope Benny the butch insisted was a real place of eternal torment and not a spiritual metaphor. Good.

Unfortunately that’s all so much mumbo jumbo, how do we make this right? Because we have to otherwise we might as well strap on a swastika armband right now and be done with it.

Withdrawal, reparations, trials of the war criminals.

Would be a start.

Update- Blairwatch asks some important questions:-
The BBC ran the story online on Monday the 26th of March, after ‘Iraq Week’, after the Question Time Iraq Special and all those Newsnight segments on the cost of the war.
Yet the BBC tell us they received the information on 14 March 2007 – Twelve days before they broadcast it. -

Share

xchange3.jpg

Dear President Ahmadinejad,

it’s an offer from me to you and really, you can keep them indefinitely, bang ‘em up for life, it’s the only language they understand.

Share

News that Bisher al-Rawi will be released from Gitmo, yet in all the reports no mention that he was a British secret service asset and we dropped him into this hell for 5 years. Is there a D-notice on this or just the usual MSM laziness?

So to jog our memories, from the Independent in Jan ’07 :-

He was open about his friendship with Abu Qatada and acted as a translator and a go-between for MI5, delivering messages given to him by agents and collecting information about his views for the service. But when his brother asked to go into business with him he leapt at the chance. With Jamil el Banna he devised plans to start to a mobile peanut oil factory in Gambia. It was on a trip to the West African state to establish the plant that he was seized.

After five years of imprisonment, Mr al-Rawi’s mental health has deteriorated to such an extent he now talks to himself constantly. Lawyers who have visited the 39-year-old Iraqi citizen say that his behaviour verges on hysteria and fear he may be losing his grip on reality.

His friend Jamil el Banna, who was seized with him five years ago by the CIA, is diabetic and, because he does not receive an appropriate diet, is beginning to lose his sight.

The men, known in Guantanamo as prisoners number 905 and 906, have not been charged with an offence and are not deemed enough of a security risk to be incarcerated in the UK or even for a control order to be imposed. Indeed, Mr al-Rawi was trusted enough to be recruited by MI5. -

There is no word on his friend being released and no mention of the spooks involvement in this.

Share

From Danny Schechter, News Dissector:-

The Oil & Energy Investment Report offered this backgrounder:
Iran also has three strategic advantages that make it a formidable threat to close the Strait of Hormuz.
Advanced antiship missiles. The newest of these skims the surface of the waves (too low to be reliably tracked on radar) at twice the speed of sound (so there’s very little time for defenders to react), and blows a hole in the target vessel right at the water line.
The only effective defense the US Navy has against these ship-killers is simply to keep enemy craft from approaching close enough to launch them.
But this is possible only on the open ocean, where AWACS radar surveillance aircraft orbiting high above the fleet can track everything in motion for hundreds of miles in every direction, and direct US fighter planes to intercept.
By contrast, the Persian Gulf is almost a narrow lake. More than 70% of its surface area lies within easy missile range of the Iranian shoreline—along which every sand dune or hillock could conceivably hide a landbased missile launcher.

In the history of naval warfare, there has never been a sea battle fought with large numbers of sea skimming antiship missiles….In addition to the hitech threat to Persian Gulf shipping, Iran also has a credible lowtech threat: antiship mines.
These are inexpensive, and can be tossed over the side of a speedboat or out the window of lowflying aircraft. After the first ship got blown up, traffic would slow to a crawl—which is almost as good as closing the Strait entirely.
…. Bottom line: Once Iran closes the Strait, and takes 20 million barrels of oil a day off the market, no one knows how long it might take to get all that oil flowing again -

If the oil supply is reduced, up goes the price, up goes the profits, as happened with the Iraq invasion. Thus military action against Iran will increase profits for oil and oil services corporations. Now can you guess who among the Bush administration are tied to said corporations?

If you answered all of them, well done!

Share

The US Senate on Thursday passed a spending bill for the conflict in Iraq that calls for US troops to be removed from the country by March 2008. The 51-47 vote in Congress’ upper chamber intensifies the showdown with US President George W Bush, who has promised to veto any congressional bill that sets a timeframe for a withdrawal. The House on Friday narrowly passed legislation that set a September 2008 pullout deadline. The 122-billion-dollar Senate bill mainly funds military operations in Iraq and Afghanistan and includes money for some
domestic spending projects. Bush has warned that funds for US troops will begin running out by April 15, and wants Congress to immediately approve the spending without a withdrawal timeframe.-

Well that’s it boys and girls, both elected chambers have passed bills that incorporate withdrawal of US forces, which means one man- King George stands in the way. If he vetoes, then it will be expected. At which point anyone not on the impeachment wagon is a fucking imbecile.

Share